I’m not familiar with Spanish word lists, but more of English word lists. For example, Oxford, Cambridge, Longman, MacMillan all have their own list. As far as I know, and I’m an ESL teacher, and don’t teach Spanish or other languages, the way people use word lists are that they include all conjugations, etc.
I can understand your point of view and Kadrian’s point of view. The subjunctive in Spanish is normally a more intermediate to advanced teaching. On the other hand, the way I use CM is that I learn grammar (verb conjugation) separately and maybe it’s because I’m already at an intermediate level to begin with. But anyway, that’s just a different point of view and so I understand where CM is coming from.
The current approach is the correct one IMO.
2 Likes
I looked up the Oxford list for English out of interest. It seems to include all conjugations and plurals. Here are some words and frequencies:
9 went
39 go
55 going
386 gone
445 goes
86 ran
343 run
364 running
1821 runs
1014 elephant
1327 elephants
6946 elephant’s (!)
1 Like
Interesting that elephant is ranked so high in frequency. Maybe English is different from Romance languages for having so few conjugated forms and not having gender/number agreement, and also different from other Germanic languages in not modifying by case as much which leads to fewer unique ‘forms’ per ‘word’. (Not saying English is simpler). Doubt it is either zoology or idiomatic usage which would be driving the frequency.
1 Like
ok this explains why in some languages you very rarely see sentences related to the absolute most common words (maybe like 1-10) for example ‘de’ in French or ‘die’ in german.
1 Like
Yet you get sentences like this in Latin, where the cloze word is “et”!
2 Likes
Maybe you’re right regarding Oxford - and I assumed Oxford would do it differently. Maybe there are different lists. Even though I mentioned Oxford and Cambridge, I don’t really use their list. I’m more familiar with Macmillan and Longman and both do it differently from oxford if what you wrote is correct regarding oxford.
Of course in English, you don’t seem to have as many conjugations of verbs as in spanish perhaps.
You often hear people say that if you know the most common say 2,500 or 3,000 words in English (I’m not sure if this applies to other languages), you would know 90% of what’s written/spoken every day (or something to this effect). Whether or not this applies to other languages, I’m not sure. But my understanding of this is that you’re not talking about the top 2,500/3,000 most common words if you’re seeing each conjugation of a verb (or even plural vs singular) as separate words altogether.
I’m not sure where that oxford list was found, but according to Macmillan and Longman, elephant is definitely not in the top 2,500/3,000 most common words.
Hmm, it looks like the list I quoted is one for use in Australian schools (https://www.oxfordwordlist.com/pages/report.asp)
This list only includes verbs once (with elephant somewhere in the top 3,000).
But my understanding of this is that you’re not talking about the top 2,500/3,000 most common words if you’re seeing each conjugation of a verb (or even plural vs singular) as separate words altogether.
I agree.
1 Like